Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a useful diagnostic tool in evaluating meniscus pathology in the knee. Data from available literature suggests sensitivity and specificity rates around 90% when compared to the gold standard findings at knee arthroscopy. We sought to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity and precision rate (positive predictive value) of MRI at diagnosing meniscus tears within our unit.
A retrospective audit of a total of 79 MRI reports and arthroscopic findings spanning a one year period was carried out. There were 66 positive MRI reports and 13 negative reports. There were 6 false positives 4 false negatives when compared to arthroscopic findings. The sensitivity of MRI for detecting meniscus tears was 93.7% with 60 out of 64 tears detected. All 4 false negatives also had at least grade III osteoarthritic changes at arthroscopy. Specificity was rather low at 60% with MRI reporting 6 tears (false positives) out of 15 patients who had no tears found at arthroscopy. The positive predictive value (precision rate) of MRI detecting tears was 90.9%.
This data shows that MRI in our unit has a comparable high sensitivity to that in various literature making it a useful tool at ruling out disease with a negative result in the clinical setting. A more useful parameter in the clinical setting is its high precision rate when faced with a positive result. However, its specificity is much lower than that in most published data. A total of 6 tears on MRI turned out not to be on arthroscopy meaning patients could have been subjected to an avoidable invasive procedure in the absence of any other indication. This highlights the importance of obtaining reports from experienced musculoskeletal radiologists and the need for surgeons to review MRI images and match them to clinical information prior to subjecting patients to surgery.
