Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Children's Orthopaedics

TRANSVERSE BONE TRANSPORT USING ILIZAROV PRINCIPLES

Combined British Limb Reconstruction Society (BLRS) & British Society for Children's Orthopaedic Surgery (BSCOS) AGM & Instructional Course – additional abstracts.



Abstract

Abstract

The specific methods of skeletal reconstruction of massive bone loss remains a topic of controversy. The problem increased in case of massive bone loss, extensive soft tissue scar, vascular compromise, and short tibial remnants.

Aim of the work

We evaluate the use of fibula in association of Ilizarov external fixator in management of massive post traumatic bone loss of tibial shaft.

Materials and methods

Between December 1999 and 2004, we treated 8 adult patients with bone loss 10 cm and more. The indication was massive bone loss, extensive soft tissue scar, vascular compromise, and short tibial remnants. Whole fibula was used in 6 conditions and partial fibula in 2. The average age was 30.5 years (range: 25:51). The fibulas were prepared for transfer either as a whole or partially transfer. Ilizarov device was applied with a special construct for each condition accordingly. Free latismus dorsi was applied in 1 patient, and fasciocutanious flaps in 2. Four patients with whole fibula transfer continued to wear orthosis for outdoor activities.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 40 months (range: 24:96) after healing. All fractures heeled between 8 and 24 months.

Conclusion

We concluded that the Ilizarov external fixator is effective in management of management of massive post traumatic bone loss of tibial shaft. It provides advantages of compensation of bone defects, length, and early rehabilitation. It has the disadvantages of long healing time, long orthotic support. Its advantages are clear in case of massive bone loss, extensive soft tissue scar, vascular compromise, and short tibial remnants.