Abstract
Currently, standard total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures focus on axial and rotational alignment of the prosthesis components and ligament balancing. Even though TKA has been constantly improved, TKA patients still experience a significantly poorer functional outcome than total hip arthroplasty patients.
Among others, complications can occur when knee kinematics (active/passive) after TKA do not correspond with the physiological conditions. We hypothesised that the Q-angle has a substantial impact on active joint kinematics and should be taken into account in TKA. The Q-angle can be influenced by the position of the tibial tuberosity (TT). A pathological position of the TT is commonly related to patellofemoral pain and knee instability. A clinically well accepted surgical treatment is the TT medialisation which causes a change in the orientation of the patella tendon and thus alters the biomechanics of the knee. If active and passive knee kinematics differs, this aspect should be considered for implant design and positioning. Therefore we investigated the sensitivity of active knee kinematics related to the position of the TT by using a complex multi-body model with a dynamic simulation of an entire gait cycle.
The validated model has been implemented in the multi-body simulation software AnyBody and was adapted for the present issue. The knee joint is represented by articulating surfaces of a standard prosthesis and contains 6 degrees of freedom. Intra-articular passive structures are implemented and the muscular apparatus consists of 159 muscles per leg. As input parameter for the sensitivity analysis, the TT was translated medially 9 mm and laterally 15 mm from the initial position in equidistant steps of 3 mm.
The Q-angle was about 10° in the initial position, which lies in the physiological range. It changed approximately 2.5° with a gradual shift of 3 mm, confirming the impact of the individual TT position on active knee kinematics. The tibiofemoral kinematics, particularly the internal/external rotation of the tibia was significantly affected. Lateralisation of the TT decreased the external rotation of the tibia, whereas a medialisation caused an increase. During contralateral toe off the external rotation was +7.5° for a medial transfer of 9 mm and −1.4° for a lateral transfer of 15 mm, respectively. The differences in external rotation were almost zero for low flexion angles, correlating with the activation pattern of the quadriceps muscle: the higher the activation of the quadriceps, the greater were the changes in kinematics.
In conclusion, knee kinematics are strongly affected by the Q-angle which is directly associated with the position of the TT. As active kinematics may show significant differences to passive kinematics, intraoperative ligament balancing may result in a suboptimal ligament situation during active motion. Since the Q-angle varies widely between gender and patients, the individual situation should be considered. The optimisation of the model and further experimental validation is one aspect of our ongoing work.
