Abstract
Conventional total knee arthroplasty aims to place the joint line perpendicular to the mechanical axis, despite the fact that the normal knee is inclined approximately 3 degrees, resulting in a medial proximal tibial angle of 87 degrees. The goal of a neutral mechanical axis is based largely on historical biomedical studies and the fact that it is easier to make a neutral tibial cut with conventional jigs and the eye. In order to balance the flexion and extension gap to accommodate a neutral tibial cut, in most patients, asymmetrical distal and posterior femoral cuts are required. The resulting position of the femoral component could be considered to be “mal-rotated” with respect to the patient's soft tissue envelope. Soft tissue releases are often required.
The target of neutral mechanical axis, or “straight and narrow,” represents a compromise position with respect to the kinematics of the knee. Neutral mechanical alignment may not confer any befits with respect to survivorship but dissatisfaction rates are high globally, with approximately 20% of patients being dissatisfied after total knee arthroplasty in multiple studies.
Computer assisted surgery and shape matching allow for consideration of placing total knee components to match an individual's anatomy, as opposed to forcing the knee into an unnatural neutral mechanical alignment.
