header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

STRATEGIES FOR DEALING WITH MASSIVE PELVIC BONE LOSS

Current Concepts in Joint Replacement (CCJR) – Winter 2012



Abstract

In North America, and for the most part globally, a cementless acetabular component with adjuvant screw fixation is the preferred technique for revision total hip arthroplasty.

However, there are situations that involve massive pelvic bone loss that preclude the use of a cementless cup alone.

Options include:

  1. i)

    Enhanced fixation components and augments

  2. ii)

    Specialised constructs (cup/cage)

  3. iii)

    Structural allografts

  4. iv)

    Bone graft substitutes

Complex acetabular revisions present the arthroplasty surgeon with challenges that require an approach with more than one solution for all scenarios. While structural allografts have recently fallen out of favour with the increasing use of enhanced fixation components, there would still appear to be a role in the case in which bone stock restoration is a primary goal. The role of bone graft substitutes remains unclear, with supportive basic science data, but limited clinical experience to date. An algorithm will be discussed to assist in prioritising the multiple goals of acetabular reconstruction and one stock restoration.