Abstract
Introduction
Historically, surgeons have focused on isolated simple coalition resection in symptomatic tarsal coalition with concomitant rigid flat foot. However, a review of literature suggests that coalitions with severe preoperative planovalgus malposition treated with resection alone are associated with continued disability and deformity. We believe that concomittant severe flatfoot should be considered as much as a pathological component and pain generator as the coalition itself. Our primary hypothesis is that simple resection of middle facet tarsal coalitions and simultaneous flat foot reconstruction can improve clinical outcomes.
Methods
Thirteen consecutively treated patients (eighteen feet) were retrospectively reviewed from the senior author's practice. Clinical examination, American Orthopaedic foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot scores, and radiographic assessments were evaluated after resection of middle facet tarsal coalitions with simultaneous flat foot reconstruction.
Results
All patients with resection and simultaneous flat foot reconstruction (calcaneal lengthening, medial cuneiform osteotomy) were satisfied and would have the same procedure again. Most patients were able to return to a higher level of sporting activity compared with preoperative ability. None of the patients had a fair or poor outcome as adjudged by their AOFAS scores.
Conclusion
Our study shows that concomittant flatfoot reconstruction in patients with symptomatic middle facet tarsal coalition increased hindfoot motion, corrected malalignment and significantly improved pain. We believe that coalition resection and concomitant flatfoot reconstruction is better option than surgical resection alone or hindfoot fusion in this cohort of patients. Triple arthrodesis should be reserved as a salvage procedure.
