header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

THE INFLUENCE OF ‘SIGNIFICANT OTHERS’ ON WORK PARTICIPATION IN THOSE WITH PERSISTENT BACK PAIN

The Society for Back Pain Research (SBPR) Annual General Meeting 2012



Abstract

Background

Individual illness perceptions have been shown to be important influences on both clinical and work outcomes for those with back pain, yet the influence of ‘significant others’ (spouse/partner/close family member) illness perceptions is rarely explored, particularly in relation to work participation.

Method

Semi-structured interviews based on the Illness Perceptions Questionnaire were conducted with two purposive samples of chronic back pain patients (working and work disabled), along with their significant others (n=28). Data were analysed using template analysis.

Results

The significant others of patients who were work disabled tended to reinforce the patients' limitations and negative consequences of the back pain condition on every aspect of their lives. They believed that patients needed to be pain-free in order to resume work, and equated treatment success with complete removal of pain. Overall, they perceived patients to be blameless victims. In contrast, the significant others of patients who had managed to remain at work despite persistent back pain focused instead on what the patient could still do, were more accepting of treatment as providing pain management rather than a cure, and tended to describe patients as being stoical and heroic.

Conclusions

This exploratory in-depth research reveals novel and interesting insights about the illness beliefs of significant others in relation to persistent back pain, and highlights the wider social circumstances that may act as barriers/facilitators to work participation.

No conflicts of interest

Sources of funding: BackCare and the BUPA foundation

This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has been presented previously at a national meeting.