header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

DIFFERENCES IN TRUNK MUSCLE ACTIVITY AND POSTURAL DURING REACHING TASKS BETWEEN SUBJECTS WITH A HISTORY OF BACK PAIN AND THOSE WITHOUT

The Society for Back Pain Research (SBPR) Annual General Meeting 2012



Abstract

Background

Subjects with Low Back Pain (LBP) often have altered trunk muscle activity and postural sway during perturbations. Research suggests different perturbations have differing results on abdominal muscle activity and postural sway, however, the majority of perturbations investigated are not realistic daily tasks and little evidence exists if the changes are still present following resolution of symptoms. Aim: to determine trunk muscle activity, Lumbar multifidus (M), iliocostalis lumborum (IL), external oblique (EO), transversus abdominus/internal oblique TrA/IO and postural sway during two reaching tasks between subjects with history of LBP (HLBP) and those without.

Method

20 volunteers, 8 HLBP (22±2yrs, 174.9±6.0cm, 68.3±6.22kgs,) and 12 without HLBP (20.58±2.23 yrs, 174.5±9.8cm, 68.6±13.9kgs) gave informed consent. Surface Electromyography (sEMG) measured muscle activity of M, IL, TrA/IO, EO and VICON force plate measured postural sway (anterior posterior (AP)centre of pressure (CoP), medial lateral(ML)CoP during high (HRT) and low reaching tasks (LRT). sEMG data was normalized to maximum voluntary contractions. Force plate data was processed using Matlab R2009b. Results: Mann-Whitney U tests noted a significant increase in EO sEMG activity in HLBP group for HRT (p=0.03). Results were insignificant for HRT: M(p=0.64), IL(0.19), TrA/IO,(p=0.14), AP CoP(p=0.44), ML CoP(p=0.69), LRT: M(p=0.58), IL(0.35) TrA/IO(p=0.58), EO(p=0.28), AP CoP (p=0.39), ML CoP (p=0.24).

Conclusion

Increased activity of EO in HLBP during HRT may be indicative of a protective mechanism. However, predominantly insignificant results may be due to low subject numbers or the perturbation tasks not being challenging enough. Further research with larger subject numbers is needed to confirm these results.

No conflicts of interest

No funding obtained

This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has been presented previously at a national meeting.