Abstract
Current dogma is that a programme of anatomic repositioning with rigid internal fixation of fractures will lead to successful healing. Failures are attributed to failures in technique, not in instruments, implants, or concepts. Current basic science research shows that in the osteoporotic skeleton, bone trabeculae, once lost, are not replaced. This is true in fractures. In a series of cases, the author will show that lost bone is indeed not replaced, and the unsuccessful clinical outcome is caused by adherence to concepts that do not solve the problem of fracture repair in the elderly. Five specific case examples will be shown to demonstrate this problem. Despite an abundance of bone graft substitutes, bone morphogenic protein preparations, and cancellous bone autografting, the problem of dependable fracture repair in the elderly skeleton still needs to be solved.
