Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the radiological changes after metal on metal resurfacing arthroplasty.
Materials and Methods
Between December 1998 and August 2004, 166 hips in 150 patients who underwent metal resurfacing arthroplasty and followed up more than 4 years. Their mean age at the time of operation was 37.3 years(range, 15–68 years) and mean period of follow-up was 6.1 years(range, 48–95 months). The cause of arthroplasty included 115 avascular necrosis, 43 osteoarthritis, 7 ankylosing spondylitis, 1 haemophilic arthropathy. All patients had anteroposterior, translateral radiographs of the hip made preoperatively and each follow-up visit, and we analyzed radiographic findings such as radiolucencies or impingement signs around implant, neck narrowing and heterotopic ossification.
Results
There was a no significant difference between preoperative and postoperative Harris hip score and range of motion. The mean stem-shaft angle was 137.4°, and 55.4% were ranged 130° to 140°. The mean inclination of acetabular component was 44.9°. There were no radiolucent lines or osteolytic lesion around the acetabular components, but 3 hips showed radiolucency around the head-neck junction(1.8%) and 4 hips showed radiolucent line around the stem (2.4%). 12 hips had impingement signs around the head-neck junction (7.2%), and 2 cases showed neck narrowing (1.2%). 3 cases had some heterotopic ossification (1.8%). In 12 cases with impingement signs, the stem-shaft angle and inclination of acetabular component were lower than control group. Pseudotumor was not found in this cohort.
Conclusions
This study demonstrates no serious radiological problems till the midterm follow-up after resurfacing arthroplasty, but osteolytic lesion such as radiolucent line around head-neck junction, neck narrowing can be a potential cause of failure in future. Even though the radiolucent line around stem of femoral component revealed no subjective symptom yet, it suggests the micromotion of femoral component which can lead to femoral component loosening. The most common radiological findings, impingement signs, seem not to have clinical significance.
