Abstract
Aim
Differing reports about the surgical management of the supracondylar humeral fracture make evidence-based practice very difficult, so knowledge of the contemporary practices and opinions of an expert body can provide a useful benchmark for appraisal; the aim of this study was to obtain this information.
Methods
An electronic 18 item, single response multiple-choice questionnaire was designed to investigate various aspects of the surgical management of supracondylar fractures, with particular focus on areas that remain controversial in the literature. Members of BSCOS were invited by email, on three occasions, to complete the questionnaire, which was posted on the web-based SurveyMonkey™ platform (www.surveymonkey.com, California, USA). The survey was available for completion for a period of 10 weeks.
Results
102 responses were received (response rate 56.7%); all respondents completed the entire questionnaire. There was almost complete agreement (>90%) in only three areas: -The preferred management of Gartland 3 fractures; The management of the fracture with an absent radial pulse and impaired digital perfusion; An ulnar nerve palsy detected four weeks post-operatively. Majority agreement (>60%) was found regarding: - Possible consequences of delay in performing closed reduction; Management of the pink, perfused hand with an absent radial pulse; Necessity of anatomical reduction. There was no consensus regarding: - K-wiring of Gartland 2 fractures; Management of ulnar nerve palsy detected one week post-operatively; Open insertion of the medial K-wire.
Conclusion
Reflecting current trends and attitudes, this survey provides information against which an individual surgeon can appraise their own practice. Strong consensus existed in areas in which clear evidence is available to inform practice. This highlights the importance of good-quality research, and identifies areas requiring further investigation.
