Abstract
Purpose
The recent emergence of autologous blood concentrates, such as platelet rich plasma (PRP), as a treatment option for patients with orthopaedic injuries has led to an extensive debate about their clinical benefit. Our objective was to determine the effectiveness of autologous blood concentrates compared with control therapy in improving pain in patients with orthopaedic bone and soft tissue injuries.
Method
We conducted a systematic review of MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1996 and 1947, respectively, up to July 2010. Additional studies were identified by contacting experts, searching the bibliographies of the included studies as well as orthopaedic meeting archives. We included published and unpublished randomized controlled trials or prospective cohort studies that compared autologous blood concentrates with a control therapy in patients with an orthopaedic injury. Two reviewers, working in duplicate, abstracted data on study characteristics and protocol. Reviewers resolved disagreement by consensus.
Results
We identified 18 randomized trials and nine prospective cohort studies. There was a lack of consistency in outcome measures across all studies. Four randomized controlled trials (N=275) and three prospective cohort studies (N=88) reported visual analog scale (VAS) scores when comparing platelet rich plasma with a control therapy across injuries to the acromion, lateral epicondyle, anterior cruciate ligament, patella, tibia and spine. There was no significant benefit for platelet rich plasma up to and including six months across randomized trial (standardized mean difference −0.35; 95% confidence interval, −0.98 to 0.28) or prospective cohort data (standardized mean difference −0.20; 95% confidence interval, −0.64 to 0.23).
Conclusion
There is a lack of evidence to support the efficacy of platelet rich plasma and autologous blood concentrates as a treatment modality for orthopaedic bone and soft tissue injuries. The literature is further complicated by a lack of standardization in study protocols, platelet separation techniques, and outcome measures.
