Abstract
Introduction
In this cohort study, the TightRope® fixation technique has been compared with the traditional screw fixation for ankle syndesmosis injuries, with respect to the accuracy of the syndesmotic reduction and their clinical correlation.
Patients and Methods
This cohort study included consecutive patients treated for ankle syndesmotic diastases between July 2007 and June 2009. Single slice axial CT scans of both the ankles together were performed at the level of syndesmosis, 1 cm above the tibial plafond. More than 2 mm widening of syndesmosis as compared to normal contra-lateral ankle was considered as significant malreduction. Clinical outcomes were measured using AOFAS and FADI Scores.
Results
Forty-six out of 55 eligible patients attended for the study. Twenty three patients were in the tightRope group and 23 in the syndesmosis screw group. Mean follow-up was 2.5 (1.5–3.5) years. Average age was 41.6 years in tightrope group and 39.8 years in syndesmosis screw group.
The mean width of normal syndesmosis was 4.01 + 0.89 mm. In tightRope group the mean width of syndesmosis was 4.37 + 1.12 mm (t-test, p = 0.30) as compared to 5.16 + 1.92 mm in screw group (t-test, p = 0.01). Five (21.7%) out of 23 ankles in screw group had syndesmotic mal reduction, while none of the tightRope group showed mal-reduction on CT scans (fisher's exact test, p = 0.04). There was no significant difference in mean post operative AOFAS score (89.56 and 86.52) and FADI score (82.42 and 81.22) between two groups.
Conclusion
The results of this study indicate that tightRope provides more accurate method of syndesmosis stabilization as compared with screw fixation. Syndesmosis malreduction is the most important independent predictor of clinical outcomes; therefore care should be taken to reduce the syndesmosis accurately.
