Abstract
Our unit has pursued a policy of using donor nerves from the same limb for grafting. Nerves which have already been affected by the primary injury are selected where possible, thus avoiding any new sensory deficit.
36 of the 41 brachial plexus repairs were available for outcome data collected prospectively over 2 years. Over a nine year period, donor nerves used for the 41 brachial plexus repairs included the lateral cutaneous nerve of the forearm, superficial radial, medial cutaneous of the forearm, ulnar and sural nerves. Patients were grouped into having injured nerve grafts only (A), injured and uninjured nerve grafts (B) and uninjured nerve grafts. The repaired brachial plexus nerves were assessed by measuring the MRC grading of the power of movement of the muscle innervated by that nerve (i.e. elbow flexion for musculocutaneous nerve). These were graded as good (MRC grading 3 or better), fair (MRC grade 1 or 2), or poor (MRC 0).
The greatest success for nerve grafting was elbow flexion with good results in 22 out of 27 assessments. Using Mann-Whitney test, Group A had significantly better results (p=0.025) than group C. However, ignoring the poorer results of shoulder abduction there was no significant difference between all 3 groups of patients.
We conclude that using injured nerve grafts taken distal to the lesion in the brachial plexus is as effective as using nerve material from an uninjured limb.
