Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcome from total knee replacement (TKR) in young versus old patients in terms of pain and functional outcome.
We used our arthroplasty database, which recorded prospectively pain and American Knee Society scores at regular intervals over ten years after TKR. The procedures used a modern, cemented resurfacing type cruciate retaining prosthesis. A cohort of young patients (≤55 years) was identified. A control group of patients ≥ 56 was identified, matching for ASA, body mass index and underlying condition. Change over time was analysed using a factorial repeated measures ANOVA test, which allowed for investigation of difference between groups. 40 Knees in 26 patients were identified. 2 patients died prior to follow up, 2 were revised within the study period (1 for infection at 2 years and one for change of poly at 7 years) and a further 4 were lost to follow up. 7 knees could not be matched and were excluded. This left a study group of 24 young and 24 older knees. Pain scores (p=0.025) and American Knee Society “Knee” (p<0.001) and “Function” (p<0.001) scores changed significantly over time. There were however no statistical differences over the 10-year period in pain (p=0.436) and knee performance (0.618) but overall function was higher throughout the period in the younger group (=0.004).
We conclude that Knee replacement in younger patients produces similar outcomes in terms of pain and function compared with older patients and TKR should not be withheld purely on account of age.
