MEASUREMENT AND IDENTIFICATION OF FIXED FLEXION DEFORMITIES OF THE KNEE

Abstract

Range of motion (ROM) is a well recognised outcome measure following TKA and combines both knee flexion and extension. In contrast to achieved flexion, fewer studies have recognised the importance of fixed flexion deformity (FFD). A post-operative FFD can adversely affect pain and functional knee scores and so its detection is important. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of standard clinical ROM measurement techniques following TKA and determine their reliability for recognising FFD.

Thirty patients six weeks post-TKA had knee ROM measurements performed with an infrared (IR) tracking system of ±1 accuracy. The patients were also assessed independently by experienced arthroplasty practitioners using a standardised goniometric measurement technique. For goniometric clinically-measured flexion (Clin_flex) and extension (Clin_ext) linear models were generated using IR-measured flexion and extension (IR_flex and IR_ext), BMI and gender as covariables. Data for extension was categorised as FFD present or absent based on Ritter's criteria and agreement was assessed using Kappa.

For both models neither BMI nor gender were significant variables. Models were Clin_flex = 0.54 + 0.66∗IR_flex (r²_adj=0.521) and Clin_ext = 0.23 + 0.50∗IR_ext (r²_adj=0.247), showing that for every 10° increase in flexion, clinical measurement only increased by 7° and for every 10° increase in FFD angle, clinical measurement only increased by 5°. In identifying FFD there was moderate agreement between the two measurements (κ=0.44) with disagreement for nine patients all being patients with FFD that were not identified clinically.

For both flexion and extension there was a greater tendency for the goniometric clinical measurements to underestimate the actual angle. In the context of TKA outcome for maximum flexion this may be preferable to overestimating. In contrast, underestimating the degree of flexion when the knee is in the extended position is not desirable as it will potentially underreport the frequency and magnitude of FFD.