Abstract
Introduction
The MAKO Surgical Rio Robotic Arm utilizes the pre-op CT images to plan positioning of the uni-condylar and patella-femoral components in order to achieve the most desirable kinematics for the knee joint. We hypothesize that the anatomic matching surfaces and the cruciate retaining design of the Restoris knee will best replicate normal knee kinematics. We tested the healthy cadaveric knee versus the MAKO knee and the most common TKR designs in order to evaluate and compare the kinematic properties.
Methods
Six healthy male left knees were dissected to leave only the knee capsule and the quadriceps tendon intact. The femur and the tibia were cut 20cm from the joint line and potted with cement into a metal housing. The knee was attached to a crouching machine capable of moving the knee joint though its normal human kinematics from extension to maximum flexion, validated in previous studies. Forces applied to the quadriceps tendon allowed the knee to flex and extend physiologically, and springs attached to the posterior were substituted as the hamstrings at a rate of half the force exerted by the quadriceps as shown in the literature. Three dimensional visual targets attached to the bones were tracked by computer software capable of recreating the positions of the bones in any given flexion angle. A cruciate retaining and posterior stabilized TKR design were chosen to represent the TKRs most commonly available in the market today. The intact knee, MAKO implanted knee, CR and PS TKR designs were tested in sequence on the same specimens. The computer software analyzed the normal distance between the bone surfaces and plotted the locations of contact which could then be quantitatively compared for each given scenario [Fig. 1].
Results
Our results showed that the MAKO knee kinematics resembled the normal knee kinematics throughout the knee flexion range. The TKR designs altered the kinematics of the knee where the internal rotation of the tibia was no longer observed with the increasing flexion angle, while the femoral roll back in high flexion was only replicated by the post of the PS design and not by the CR design.
Conclusions
Anatomic restoration of the joint surfaces and retention of the cruciate ligaments maintained normal kinematics, which is expected to be an advantage in obtaining improved clinical results.
