Abstract
This study aimed to compare the early clinical results and stem subsidence between three consecutive series of revision hip replacement cases with femoral impaction bone grafting to evaluate the effects of developments in technique. In the original series 1 (n=23), bone graft was irradiated at 25kG. I n series 2 (n=12) non-irradiated double washed graft and long stems were used as required.
In series 3 (n=21) modular tamps were used. Sensitive radiographic analysis techniques, EBRA and RSA, were used to measure stem subsidence. Major stem re-revision was required in five hips in series one, one hip in series two and no hips in series three. Two periprosthetic fractures occurred in series one. There was a statistically significant reduction in stem subsidence at the cement-bone interface at 12 months between series one and series two and three (p<0.05). In series three there was negligible stem subsidence at the cement-bone interface.
Technique developments in femoral impaction grafting, including the use of modular tamps designed to simply the procedure, yields excellent early clinical and radiographic results. Using RSA, we have shown that the fixation of the stems in bone is comparable to that achieved in primary hip replacement.
