Abstract
Recently, several preliminary reports have been issued on the application of computer assistance to bone tumour surgery. Surgical navigation systems can apply three-dimensional images such as CT and MR images to intraoperative visualization. Although CT is better at describing cortical bone status, MRI is considered the best method for defining the extent of marrow involvement for bone tumours and for planning surgical resection in bone tumour surgery. There have been a few reports on the application of MR imaging to navigation-assisted bone tumour surgery through CT–MR image fusion. However, the CT–MRI fusion technique requires additional costs and exposure of the patient to radiation from the preoperative CT, as well as additional time for image fusion. Above all, the image fusion process is a kind of registration (image to image registration) that inevitably leads to registration error. Herein we describe a new method for the direct application of MR images to navigation-assisted bone tumour surgery as an alternative to CT–MRI fusion.
Six patients with an orthopaedic malignancy were employed for this method during navigation-assisted tumour resection. Resorbable pin placement and rapid 3-dimensional spoiled gradient echo sequences made the direct application of MR images to computer-assisted bone tumour surgery without CT–MR image fusion possible. A paired-point registration technique was employed for patient-image registration in all patients. It took 20 min on average to set up the navigation (range 15 to 25 minutes). The mean registration error was 0.98 mm (range 0.4 to 1.7 mm). On histologic examination, distances from tumours to resection margins were in accord with preoperative plans. Mean duration of follow-up was 25.8 months (range 18 to 32 months). No patient had a local recurrence or distant metastasis at the last follow-up.
Direct patient-to-MRI registration is a very useful method for bone tumour surgery, permitting the application of MR images to intraoperative visualization without any additional costs or exposure of the patient to radiation from the preoperative CT scan.
