header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Foot & Ankle

CALCANEAL OSTEOTOMY – A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT FIXATION METHODS

British Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (BOFAS)



Abstract

Introduction

Calcaneal osteotomy is often performed together with other procedures to correct hindfoot deformity. There are various methods of fixation ranging from staples, headed or headless screws or more recently stepped locking plates. It is not clear if one method is superior to the other. In this series we compare the outcome of various methods of fixation with particular attention to the need for subsequent hardware removal.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective review of the records of a consecutive series of patients who had a calcaneal osteotomy performed in our unit within the last 5 years was undertaken. All patients had had their osteotomy through an extended lateral approach to their calcaneous. The subsequent fixation was performed using one of three methods; a lateral plate placed through the same incision; a ‘headless’; or a ‘headed’ screw through a separate stab incision inserted through the infero-posterior heel. Records were kept of subsequent symptoms from the hardware and need for metalwork removal as well as any complications. When screws were inserted the entry point in relation to the weight-bearing surface of the calcaneous was also recorded.

Results

Sixty-three osteotomies were investigated of which 15 were fixed using a headed screw, 18 using a headless screw (acutrak TM) and the remaining 30 were fixed using a lateral plate. There was a 100% union rate regardless of method of fixation, no patient was investigated or subject to revision surgery for a suspected non-union. Overall 47% of the headed screws, 10% of the headless screws and 9% of the lateral plates were removed to address symptoms that were suspected to arise from the hardware. There was a 10% (3 from 30) rate of wound complication in the lateral plate cohort. In all these cases there was persisting discharge from the extended lateral wound that resolved with dressing and antibiotic therapy alone.

Conclusions

Calcaneal osteotomies have a high union rate regardless of fixation method. Fixation using a headed screw is associated with a high rate of secondary screw removal and this is unrelated to the position of the screw in relation to the weight-bearing surface of the calcaneous. Hardware problems are less frequent in the ‘headless’ screw or the lateral plate groups; however in this series, the incidence of local wound complications was higher in the group fixed with a lateral plate.