Abstract
The treatment of very distal tibial fractures and pilon fractures is difficult. There is a wide variation in the severity of injury and the options for surgical management. Plates and external fixation each have their advantages. This retrospective study looks at complications and technical tips for anterolateral plating.
35 consecutive distal tibial platings were evaluated. The AO classification for each fracture was determined and any patient factors affecting outcome. Outcome variables included time to radiological union, infection rate, wound breakdown rate, and joint movement after treatment.
There were 32 anterolateral platings and 3 medial platings. The union rate was 95%. There were two deep infections which required surgical treatment. There were two wound breakdowns, one of which required plastic surgical intervention. Two patients had prominent metalwork, requiring removal. Other complications included deep peroneal nerve palsy, stiffness, and vascular compromise. The complication rates were lower for surgeons operating more frequently on these fractures. Two patients subsequently required bone transport and one required an amputation.
The complication rate found was similar to that reported in the literature. The few complications were however very significant for the patient and also for the surgeon as they required bone transport. Complications other than infection occurred in the few cases performed by surgeons low on their learning curve. We present technical tips for surgery. The presence of callus only after mobilisation indicates that union is slow.
Anterolateral plating is a viable option for distal tibial fractures, especially 43B fractures. There is a learning curve associated with their use. Complication rates are low overall, but significant consequences can accompany complications. As an alternative to external fixation, distal locking plates are not a pain free option for the surgeon, as well as for the patient.
