header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Foot & Ankle

MINIMALLY INVASIVE CHEILECTOMY: FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME AND COMPARISON WITH OPEN CHEILECTOMY

British Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (BOFAS)



Abstract

Open cheilectomy is an established surgical treatment for hallux rigidus. Cheilectomy is now being performed using minimally invasive (MIS) techniques. In this prospective study we report the outcome of minimally invasive cheilectomy comparing the results with a matched group who had cheilectomy using standard open procedure

Methods

Prospective study of 47 patients. 22 patients had MIS cheilectomy between March 2009 and September 2010. We compared the outcome with a matched group (25 patients) who had open cheilectomy. Functional outcome was assessed using the Manchester Oxford Foot and ankle questionnaire (MOXFQ). The MOXFQ is a validated questionnaire designed to be self-completed and used as an outcome measure for foot surgery. Patients' satisfaction and complications were recorded.

Results

In the MIS group, the median follow up was 11 months (4–23). The median preoperative MOXFQ score was 34/64(23) and the median postoperative score was 19/64 (p = <0.02). In the open group the median follow up was 17 months (9–27). The median preoperative MOXFQ score was 35/64 and the median postoperative score was 7.5/64 (p = <0.0001). The metric score of the three domains of the MOXFQ showed statistical improvement in both groups. The improvement didn't reach statistical significance between the open and MIS groups. There were three failures in the open group (Fusion) compared to none in the MIS.

Discussion

There was significant improvement in foot pain, function and social aspect in the MIS group comparable to the open group. In our analysis we didn't account for the learning curve involved in the MIS technique. The MIS procedure has the advantage of small incision and dissection and accordingly less swelling and quicker recovery.

Conclusion

MIS cheilectomy is an effective alternative procedure with satisfactory functional outcome and high patient satisfaction.

Results are comparable to the standard open cheilectomy with a lower apparent failure rate.