Abstract
This prospective longitudinal study compares the results of isolated endoscopic ACL reconstruction utilizing 4-strand hamstring tendon (HT) or patellar tendon (PT) autograft over a 15-year period with respect to re-injury, clinical outcomes and the development of osteoarthritis.
90 consecutive patients with isolated ACL rupture were reconstructed with a PT autograft and 90 patients received HT autograft, with an identical surgical technique. Patients were assessed at 2, 5, 7, 10 and 15 years. Assessment included the IKDC Knee Ligament Evaluation including radiographic evaluation, KT1000, Lysholm Knee Score, kneeling pain, and clinical outcomes.
Subjects who received the PT graft had significantly worse outcomes compared to those who received the HT graft at 15 years for the variables of radiologically detectable osteoarthritis (p=0.03), motion loss (p=0.01), single leg hop test (p=0.002), participation in strenuous activity (p=0.05), and kneeling pain (p=0.04). There was no significant difference between the HT and PT groups in overall IKDC grade (p=0.31). ACL graft rupture occurred in 16% of HT group and 8% of the PT group (p=0.07). ACL graft rupture was associated with non-ideal tunnel position (odds ratio 5.0) and males (odds ratio 3.2). Contralateral ACL rupture occurred in significantly more PT patients (24%) than HT patients (12%) (p=0.03), and was associated with age < 18 years (odds ratio 4.1) and the patellar tendon graft (odds ratio 2.6). Radiologically detectable osteoarthritis at 15 years was associated with the PT graft (odds ratio 2.3).
Significant differences have developed in the groups at 15 years after surgery which were not seen at earlier reviews. Compared to the HT Group, the PT group had significantly worse outcomes with respect to radiological osteoarthritis, extension loss and functional tests but no significant difference in laxity was identified. There was a high incidence of ACL injury after reconstruction, to both the reconstructed and the contralateral knee.
