Abstract
To examine the performance of film compared to DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) images in the detection and volume appreciation of periprosthetic osteolysis around total knee replacements.
Simulated osteolytic lesions were created around 3 cadaveric total knee replacements and fluoroscopic-assisted radiography as well as Computed Tomography derived imaging taken. Arthoplasty surgeons then reviewed the hard images (AP, Lateral, Paired Obliques and Computed Tomography) on 2 separate occasions regarding the presence and size of lesions. With a minimum of 2 months since the last assessment, DICOM images taken from the same knees were then assessed by the same 3 arthroplasty surgeons in the same manner using Syngo™ Pictured Archive Communication System on hospital computer monitors.
Area under the ROC for lesions detection and kappa statistic for volume appreciation derived from the DICOM assessments were not superior with statistical significance to film assessments. Combinations of imaging that incorporated Paired Oblique views had superior performance in both hard-copy and DICOM imaging.
Digital imaging in this study has not clearly demonstrated superiority to film images for detection and volume appreciation of periprosthetic osteolysis around total knee replacements. The value of the addition of the oblique view to routine assessment is again demonstrated.
