Abstract
2D/3D image registration techniques have supplanted RSA for kinematic analysis as they are faster, non-invasive and enable pre and post op studies. Improved algorithms have solved the problem of accuracy of out-of-plane translation [1,2]. The aim of this study is to apply these new algorithms to the post op case.
In this study, Computer-Aided Design (CAD) models of the femoral and tibial components were registered to fluoroscopic images. The prosthesis (RBK knee, Global Orthopaedic Technology), was implanted into a sawbones knee. A perspex cage held the knee static while simultaneous fluoroscopy and dual X-rays were taken from 0 and 90 degrees flexion. Translations orthogonal to the fluoroscope were simulated by sliding the cage at 5 mm intervals. The CAD models were then registered with the fluoroscopy frames. Registration information was used to perform kinematic analysis.
This study has demonstrated greater accuracy for the post operative than pre-operative registration applications. The standard deviation of error for flexion/extension was 0.23° with respect to RSA. The average standard deviation of error for out-of-plane rotations (i.e. abduction/adduction and internal/external rotation) was 0.46°. Translations such as anterior-posterior drawer, compression/distraction and medio-lateral shift had errors of 0.16 mm, 0.17 mm and 0.59 mm, respectively. Both the registration and kinematic analysis accuracies for prosthesis components were superior to those for registration of natural (e.g. cadaver) bones [1]. While rotation accuracies improved about 0.1°, improvement in translation was substantial. In particular, medio-lateral translation accuracy has improved from 1 mm (in our previous study) to 0.59 mm, which is promising. It is worth noting that the best reported accuracy for out-of-plane or medio-lateral translation has been 1.03 mm [2]. Hence, this technique is competitive with other 3D/2D registration methods reported in the literature.
Our experiments show that our 3D CAD to 2D fluoroscopy registration method is sufficiently accurate to produce confident and reliable analysis of prospective kinematics studies.
