header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

The Influence of Malrotation and Material of the Femoral Component on Patellofemoral Contact Mechanics and Wear During Gait

The International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty (ISTA)



Abstract

Introduction

Malrotation of the femoral component is a cause of patellofemoral maltracking after TKA. Its precise effect on the patellofemoral (PF) mechanics has not been well quantified. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of malrotation of the femoral component on PF initial contact area, initial contact pressure and wear after 4 million full gait cycles in TKA using a knee simulator. Moreover, the influence of the counterface material (CoCr or OxZr) on PF wear was also investigated.

Materials & Methods

Femoral components (FCs) were cemented onto specially designed fixtures, allowing positioning of the FC in different angles of axial rotation. Patellar buttons and FCs were then mounted in a Prosim knee simulator.

Patellofemoral contact mechanics

Seven axial rotation configurations were tested: neutral (FC parallel to the epicondylar axis), 2.5° endo- and exorotation, 5° endo- and exorotation and 7.5° endo- and exorotation.

Patellar contact location, contact area and contact pressure were measured dynamically during 20 gait cycles with a Tekscan sensor covering the patella collecting data at a rate of 100 frames per second.

Patellofemoral wear

For three alignments (neutral, 5° endo- and exorotation), a PF wear test of 4 million cycles in bovine serum (diluted to 40%) was done with three CoCr and three OxZr components on conventional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE, density: 0.93mg/mm3). Every 0.5 million cycles the test lubricant was replaced, the patellar samples were cleaned and dried and polyethylene wear was measured gravimetrically. A linear regression model was used to calculate the wear rate of each patellar sample. Aggregate wear rates were determined for each test condition by pooling the measurements of all three patellar samples.

Results

For all six endorotation and exorotation configurations, the contact area was significantly lower and the contact pressure significantly higher than the neutral position (p < 0.001, Figs 1 and 2). In the patellofemoral wear test, the highest average wear rate was found in the group of endorotated CoCr femoral components (0.54 mm3/Mcycle), but this is still only 11% of a typical tibiofemoral wear rate with the same CoCr component (5 mm3/Mcycle). The following trends in the average wear rates could be observed: the average wear rate for CoCr (0.34 mm3/Mcycle) was higher than for OxZr (0.19 mm3/Mcycle) and the average wear rate for 5° endorotation (0.35 mm3/Mcycle) was higher than for 5° exorotation (0.21 mm3/Mcycle) and neutral alignment (0.23 mm3/Mcycle) (Figs 3 and 4). None of these differences reached statistical significance (p=0.05), though.

Discussion

Our results indicate that both internally and externally malrotated femoral components significantly decrease contact areas and significantly increase contact pressures in the patellofemoral joint. These significant changes in contact pressure didn't translate in significant changes in wear, however. Overall, patellofemoral wear is very small compared to tibiofemoral wear, in all the configurations that we investigated.

Based on our results, we can conclude that clinical problems with patellar maltracking after femoral component malrotation seem not to be related to increased wear, but rather to pain and patellar instability.


∗Email: Jean-Philippe.Luyckx@smith-nephew.com