header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

Using Computer Knee Navigation to Measure Genu Recurvatum

The International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty (ISTA)



Abstract

Introduction

Genu recurvatum is a deformity rarely seen in patients receiving total knee arthroplasty. This deformity is defined as hyperextension of the knee greater than 5°. The incidence of recurvatum has been cited in the literature as less than 1%.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to report data on 1510 consecutive total knee replacements (TKR) with navigation to demonstrate that the incidence of genu recurvatum is higher than what is cited in the literature.

Methods

This is a retrospective review that was approved by our health science institutional review board. We reviewed resting, intra-operative alignment of 206 navigated total knee arthroplasty cases with recurvatum. This is data from 4 surgeons who are lower extremity joint replacement physicians. The range of motion (ROM) is measured and recorded by the attending physician during routine physical examination of the lower extremity. Demographic data was used to describe the patient group. The data will include pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative ROM. The intra-operative data will be captured by the navigation system, this sytem is accurate to 1° and 1mm. The post-operative ROM will be obtained from an office visit. We are interested in the post-operative ROM to demonstrate correction of the recurvatum.

Results

One thousand five hundred and ten primary TKR were reviewed for this study. Two hundred and six patients (13.6%) had genu recurvatum as measured by the navigation computer. The range of recurvatum was 0.5–30°; mean 5 degrees (STD 4.3°). Sixty six patients had >5 degrees of recurvatum (4.4%). Only 2 patients had recurvatum recorded on their pre-operative office visit. These 2 patients did not have extreme recurvatum, 3° and a few degrees on walking respectively. No patient had recurvatum at the 4 year visit (visit range 3 months – to 4 years). The primary diagnosis for the group was osteoarthritis, 92 %. All cases of recurvatum were treated with under resection of the femur and correction of the coronal plane. All cases were corrected intraoperatively.

Conclusion

Etiology of recurvatum can be due to bony insufficiency at the anterior tibia, insufficiency at both femoral condyles or laxity of the posterior capsule and ligaments. During surgery this can be addressed by under resection of the femur and undersizing the femoral component to increase the flex space, or soft tissue tightening can be implemented. Our surgical technique aimed to balance hyperextension with reduction of the distal femoral cut. Coronal balance is also important in the management of hyperextension. Current total knee designs lack the extension cam effect and make sagital balancing critical. Recurvatum is difficult to correct after total knee arthroplasty and this issue is important to address at the time of primary surgery.

The use of a navigation system helped us appreciate a deformity that is not easily detected during routine examination. This study found that genu recurvatum in patients receiving TKR is significantly higher than what is reported in the literature. This finding has important implications for the management of a small percentage but nonetheless significant number of patients. This deformity is not appreciated in the clinical setting during routine examination.


∗Email: mbayers-thering@kaleidahealth.org