Wear of Metal-on-Metal Bearings in THRs: Effect of Head Size Under Steep Cup Inclination Angle, Microseparation and Edge Loading Conditions

INTRODUCTION

Retrieval and clinical studies of metal-on-metal (MoM) bearings have associated increased wear¹ and elevated patient ion levels² with steep cup inclination angles and edge loading conditions. The University of Leeds have previously developed a hip simulator method that has been validated against retrievals and shown to replicate clinically relevant wear rates and wear mechanisms^3,4. This method involves introducing lateral microseparation to represent adverse joint laxity and offset deficiency. This study aimed to investigate the effect of microseparation representing translational malpostion, and increased cup inclination angle, representing rotational malposition, in isolation and combined on the wear of different sizes (28 and 36mm) MoM bearing in total hip replacement (THRs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The wear of size 28mm and 36mm MoM THRs bearings was determined under different in vitro conditions using the Leeds II hip simulator. For each size bearing, two clinical cup inclination angles were considered, 45° (n=3) and 65° (n=3). The first three million cycles were run under standard gait conditions and subsequently three million cycles were run under microseparation conditions. Standard gait cycles included a twin peak load (300N–3000N), extension/flexion (−15°/+30°) and internal/external rotation (±10°). Microseparation⁴ was achieved by applying a 0.4–0.5mm medial displacement to the cup relative to the head during the swing phase of the standard gait cycle resulting in edge loading at heel strike. The lubricant was 25% (v/v) new-born calf serum. The wear volume was determined through gravimetric analysis every million cycles. One way ANOVA was performed (significance: p<0.05), and 95% confidence limits were calculated.

RESULTS

Under standard gait conditions, the 28mm MoM bearing showed head-rim contact and increased wear rate with increased cup inclination angle but the 36mm bearing did not show any increase in wear. Microseparation and edge loading increased the wear rate of MoM bearings for all cup inclination angle conditions and bearing sizes (Figure 1).

DISCUSSION

With the larger size bearings, head-rim contact occurred at a steeper cup inclination angle (>65°) providing an advantage over smaller bearings. Under standard gait conditions, where head-rim contact did not occur, wear was low, due to mixed lubrication and wear reduction through a protein boundary film. However, edge loading of the cup, with elevated stress, caused excess damage and wear. This effect was more dominant with microseparation conditions to that of head-rim contact due to increased cup inclination angle alone.

Under microseparation conditions, there were no significant differences in the wear rates of the 28mm and the 36mm size bearings. However, the wear rates obtained in this study for 28mm and 36mm bearings were significantly lower than those obtained for size 39mm surface replacement MoM bearings (8.99 mm³/million cycles) tested under the same adverse conditions⁵.

CONCLUSION

This study shows the importance of acetabular cup design and correct surgical positioning of the femoral head and acetabular cup and restoration of offset and cup centre.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This study was supported by the Furlong Research Charitable Foundation (FRCF) and the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) as part of a collaboration with the Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit (LMBRU). The components were custom made specifically for this project by Corin Ltd.