Abstract
Treatment of syndesmotic injuries is a subject of ongoing controversy. Locking plates have been shown to provide both angular and axial stability and therefore could potentially control both shear forces and resist widening of the syndesmosis. The aim of this study is to determine whether a two-hole locking plate has biomechanical advantages over conventional screw stabilisation of the syndesmosis in this pattern of injury. Six pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaver lower legs were prepared to simulate an unstable Maisonneuve fracture. The limbs were then mounted on a servo-hydraulic testing rig and axially loaded to a peak load of 800N for 12000 cycles. Each limb was compared with its pair; one receiving stabilisation of the syndesmosis with two 4.5mm quadricortical cortical screws, the other a two-hole locking plate with 3.2mm locking screws (Smith and Nephew). Each limb was then externally rotated until failure occurred. Failure was defined as fracture of bone or metalwork, syndesmotic widening or axial migration >2mm. Both constructs effectively stabilised the syndesmosis during the cyclical loading within 1mm of movement. However the locking plate group demonstrated superior resistance to torque compared to quadricortical screw fixation (40.6Nm vs 21.2Nm respectively, p value <0.03).
Conclusion
A 2 hole locking plate (3.2mm screws) provides significantly greater stability of the syndesmosis to torque when compared with 4.5mm quadricortical fixation.
