Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

JUDET OSTEO-PERIOSTEAL DECORTICATION FOR TREATMENT OF NON AND MAL UNION: THE CORNWALL EXPERIENCE

South West Orthopaedic Club (SWOC)



Abstract

The treatment of nonunion is challenging providing the surgeon with a variety of different surgical options in order to encourage and achieve bone consolidation. Despite excellent results presented in 2008 of 99% union rates, Judet Osteo-Periosteal Decortication does not seem to be popular at present with bone grafting and distraction osteo-modelling being the favoured option.

Retrospective analysis was performed from December 2002 to December 2008 of 46 cases of osteoperiosteal decortication(Judet technique) for failure of fracture union.

Union was successfully achieved in 39 of the 45 patients(85%) after a mean delay of 10.7 months(range 3-39 months). Thirty patients(65%) achieved union following the decortication procedure without subsequent operations. The mean number of procedures following decortication was 0.6(range 0-4) mostly being performed for metalwork failure. Metal work failure occurred in 13 cases(28%) with the majority occurring in decortications of the femur(n=11,85%). The femur was the location of all persistent non unions in the series. The nonunion scoring system(0-100,Calori et al 2008) means were noticeably worse for the persistent nonunion group(41.67, range 34-46) compared to the union group(29, range 4-52).

Osteoperiosteal decortication remains a highly effective surgical technique in the management of failed fracture union.