Abstract
Controversy exists whether a single proximal lateral tibia (PLT) locked plate is adequate for bicondylar fractures and whether the use of integral raft screws makes the use of bone graft less important.
57 consecutive patients who underwent reconstruction with a locked PLT plate were retrospectively reviewed. Radiographs were examined for operative reduction and subsequent loss of reduction.
55 patients were followed-up for an average of 27 weeks. Fractures were divided into unicondylar (Group 1, n=33) and bicondylar (Group 2, n=22). Union occurred in all patients, with no revisions or removal of metalwork at final follow-up. In 50 patients (88%), the fracture was reduced to within 2mm of anatomical. Articular surface collapse of >2mm occurred in three patients. Nine patients underwent bone grafting with no difference in outcome. A supplementary medial plate was used in three patients with a separate posteromedial fragment.
Except for a separate posteromedial fragment, the use of a single locked PLT plate for bicondylar fractures allows union to occur without failure. With the use of integral raft screws, the need for bone graft is questionable. The short-term radiological results and complication rate of PLT locked plating is excellent.
