header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

MASQUELET TECHNIQUE USING A MOUSE FEMUR CRITICAL-SIZED BONE DEFECT MODEL: CHARACTERIZATION OF MACROPHAGE EXPRESSION IN INDUCED MEMBRANE

The European Orthopaedic Research Society (EORS) 31st Annual Meeting, Porto, Portugal, 27–29 September 2023. Part 2 of 2.



Abstract

The Masquelet technique is a variable method for treating critical-sized bone defects, but there is a need to develop a technique for promoting bone regeneration. In recent studies of bone fracture healing promotion, macrophage-mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) cross-talk has drawn attention. This study aimed to investigate macrophage expression in the induced membrane (IM) of the Masquelet technique using a mouse critical-sized bone defect model.

The study involved a 3-mm bone defect created in the femur of mice and fixed with a mouse locking plate. The Masquelet (M) group, in which a spacer was inserted, and the Control (C) group, in which the defect was left intact, were established. Additionally, a spacer was inserted under the fascia of the back (B group) to form a membrane due to the foreign body reaction. Tissues were collected at 1, 2, and 4 weeks after surgery (n=5 in each group), and immunostaining (CD68, CD163: M1, M2 macrophage markers) and RT-qPCR were performed to investigate macrophage localization and expression in the tissues.

The study found that CD68-positive cells were present in the IM of the M group at all weeks, and RT-qPCR showed the highest CD68 expression at 1 week. In addition, there was similar localization and expression of CD163. The C group showed lower expression of CD68 and CD163 than the M group at all weeks. The B group exhibited CD68-positive cells in the fibrous capsule and CD163-positive cells in the connective tissue outside the capsule, with lower expression of both markers compared to the M group at all weeks.

Macrophage expression in IM in M group had different characteristics compared to C group and B group. These results suggest that the IM differs from the fibrous capsules due to the foreign body reaction, and the macrophage-MSC cross-talk may be involved in Masquelet technique.


Email: