Abstract
Introduction
A long nail is often recommended for treatment of complex trochanteric fractures but requires longer surgical and fluoroscopy times. A possible solution could be a nail with an appropriate length which can be locked in a minimally invasive manner by the main aiming device. We aimed to determine if such a nail model* offers similar structural stability on biomechanical testing on artificial bone as a standard long nail when used to treat complex trochanteric fractures.
Method
An artificial osteoporotic bone model was chosen. As osteosynthesis material two cephalomedullary nails (CMN) were chosen: a superior locking nail (SL-Nail) which can be implanted with a singular targeting device, and a long nail (long-nail) with distal locking using free-hand technique. AO31-A2.2 fractures were simulated in a standardized manner. The insertion of the nail was strictly in accordance with the IFU and surgical manual of the manufacturer. The nail was locked dynamically proximally and statically distally. Axial height of the construct, varus collapse, and rotational deformity directly after nail insertion were simulated. A Universal Testing Machine was used. Measurements were made with a stereo-optic tracking system. Reactive movements were recorded and evaluated in all six degrees of freedom. A comparative analysis provided information about the stability and deformation of the assemblies to be compared.
Result
There was a detectable difference in the axial fracture movement resulting in narrowing of the fracture gap. The load displacement was 1.7mm higher for the SL-Nail. There was no difference in varus collapse or rotational deformity between the nail variants.
Conclusion
We conclude that there are small differences which are clinically insignificant and that a superior locking nail can safely be used to manage complex trochanteric fractures.
*DCN SL nail, SWEMAC, Linköping, Sweden
Funding: no funding
