Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

CAN 3D PLANNING HELP OPTIMIZE FEMORAL HEAD COVERAGE IN PERIACETABULAR OSTEOTOMY?

The European Orthopaedic Research Society (EORS) 32nd Annual Meeting, Aalborg, Denmark, 18–20 September 2024.



Abstract

Introduction

Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) repositions the acetabulum to increase femoral head coverage (FHC) in hip dysplasia. Currently, there is a paucity of objective peri-operative metrics to plan for optimal acetabular fragment repositioning. The MSk Lab Hip 3D Planner (MSkL-HP) measures acetabular morphology and simulates PAO cuts to achieve optimal FHC. We evaluated how adjusting location and orientation of cutting planes can alter FHC.

Method

MSkL-HP simulated 274 feasible PAOs on four dysplastic hips. Femoroacetabular anatomy was landmarked to simulate cutting planes. Posterior column and ischial cuts were standardised, whilst iliac and pubic cut combinations varied. The slope of the iliac cut was either neutral (aligned to pelvis), exit point 5mm above the entry point (+5), or 5mm below (-5). The slope of the pubic cut was either 90°, 50°, or 70° (medial-to-lateral). Iliac and pubic cuts were simulated 0, 5 and 15mm - distal and medial – to a classic cut. Outcome measures were achieved LCEA, Tönnis, FHC and % bone overlap at the pubic cut. Targets were LCEA >30°, Tönnis angle <10°, and FHC >70% and minimum bone overlap ≥10%.

Results

All feasible PAOs resulted in improvement from pre-operative metrics. Personalised cutting planes provided greater benefit than standard planes. Kruskal Wallis tests showed that the iliac cut at 5mm or 15mm resulted in a greater LCEA and lower Tönnis compared to the classic cut (p<0.05). Changing location of the pubic cut, and slope of the iliac and pubic cuts did not significantly affect LCEA and Tönnis in all hips (p<0.05). Cut combinations optimising metrics were associated with a lower % pubic cut overlap.

Conclusion

MSkL-HP feasibly and reliably planned personalised PAO, measuring pre-operative and simulated post-operative objective metrics. Patient-specific pubic and iliac cuts enable greater correction whilst maintaining bone overlap. Further simulations on patients with varying morphology may improve standard techniques.


Corresponding author: Anshini Thakur