Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

PATIENT-SPECIFIC TIBIAL IMPLANTS: ALGORITHMIC DESIGN PROCESSES FOR CLINICAL CASES

The European Orthopaedic Research Society (EORS) 32nd Annual Meeting, Aalborg, Denmark, 18–20 September 2024.



Abstract

Introduction

The surgical treatment of critical-sized bone defects with complex three-dimensional (3D) geometries is a challenge for the treating surgeon. Additive manufacturing such as 3D printing enables the production of highly individualized bone implants meeting the shape of the patient's bone defect and including a tunable internal structure. In this study, we showcase the design process for patient-specific implants with critical-sized tibia defects.

Methods

Two clinical cases of patients with critical tibia defects (size 63×20×21 mm and 50×24×17 mm) were chosen. Brainlab software was used for segmentation of CT data generating 3D models of the defects. The implant construction involves multiple stages. Initially, the outer shell is precisely defined. Subsequently, the specified volume is populated with internal structures using Voronoi, Gyroid, and NaCl crystal structures. Variation in pore size (1.6 mm and 1.0 mm) was accomplished by adjusting scaffold size and material thickness.

Results

An algorithmic design process in Rhino and Grasshopper was successfully applied to generate model implants for the tibia from Ct data. By integrating a precise mesh into an outer shell, a scaffold with controlled porosity was designed. In terms of the internal design, both Voronoi and Gyroid form macroscopically homogeneous properties, while NaCl, exhibits irregularities in density and consequently, in the strength of the structure. Data implied that Voronoi and Gyroid structures adapt more precisely to complex and irregular outer shapes of the implants.

Conclusion

In proof-of-principle studies customized tibia implants were successfully generated and printed as model implants based on resin. Further studies will include more patient data sets to refine the workflows and digital tools for a broader spectrum of bone defects. The algorithm-based design might offer a tremendous potential in terms of an automated design process for 3D printed implants which is essential for clinical application.


Corresponding author: Julie Kühl