Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

INVESTIGATING THE DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN DETECTION OF MEDICAL MENISCAL EXTRUSION IN KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS PATIENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

The European Orthopaedic Research Society (EORS) 32nd Annual Meeting, Aalborg, Denmark, 18–20 September 2024.



Abstract

Introduction

Knee Osteoarthritis (KOA) is a prevalent joint disease requiring accurate diagnosis and prompt management. The condition occurs due to cartilage deterioration and bone remodeling. Ultrasonography has emerged as a promising modality for diagnosing KOA. Medial meniscus extrusion (MME), characterized by displacement of medial meniscus beyond the joint line has been recognized as a significant marker of KOA progression. This study aimed to explore potentials Ultrasound findings in timely detection of MME and compare it to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a reference standard.

Method

A comprehensive literature search was performed in 4 databases from inception to May 1 2024. Two independent reviewers, initiated screening protocols and selected the articles based on inclusion and exclusion criteria and then extracted the data. Meta-analysis was conducted using R 4.3.2 packages mada and metafor.

Result

A total of 2500 articles from 4 databases was retrieved; however, following the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria 23 articles were finally extracted. These studies collectively encompassed a total of 777 patients with mean age of 53.2±7.4. The mean BMI calculated for patients was 28.31 ± 2.45. All patients underwent non-weight bearing knee ultrasonography in supine position with 0° flexion. The reported medial meniscus extrusion was 2.58 mm for articles using MRI and 2.65 mm for those using Ultrasound (MD: 0.05 ± 0.12, P= 0.65, I2: 54%). Our meta-analysis revealed insignificant difference between US and MRI. (SMD: 0.03, 95% CI: -0.18 _0.23, P= 0.77, I2: 56%) Meta analysis for diagnostic accuracy measures yielded a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 90.8% and 77% (95% CI: 84.2% – 94.8%, 35.5% – 95.3%, respectively, I2: 44%).

Conclusion

Our results indicate a close alignment in the accuracy of measurements obtained using Ultrasound modality. The narrow range suggests a minimal discrepancy in MME values between MRI and ultrasound, highlighting their comparable precision in diagnostic assessments.


Corresponding author: Mohammad-Taha Pahlevan-Fallahy