Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

THE POTENTIAL OF STRAIN SENSORS ON A POSTERIOR INSTRUMENTATION TO ASSESS HEALING OF TRANSOSSEOUS FRACTURES IN A LUMBAR VERTEBRA: A CADAVERIC STUDY

The European Orthopaedic Research Society (EORS) 32nd Annual Meeting, Aalborg, Denmark, 18–20 September 2024.



Abstract

Introduction

Transosseous flexion-distraction injuries of the spine typically require surgical intervention by stabilizing the fractured vertebra during healing with a pedicle-screw-rod constructs. As healing is taking place the load shifts from the implant back to the spine. Monitoring the load-induced deflection of the rods over time would allow quantifiable postoperative assessment of healing progress without the need for radiation exposure or frequent hospital visits. This approach, previously demonstrated to be effective in assessing fracture healing in long bones and monitoring posterolateral spinal fusion in sheep, is now being investigated for its potential in evaluating lumbar vertebra transosseous fracture healing.

Method

Six human cadaveric spines were instrumented with pedicle-screws and rods spanning L3 vertebra. The spine was loaded in Flexion-Extension (FE), Lateral-Bending (LB) and Axial-Rotation (AR) with an intact L3 vertebra (representing a healed vertebra) and after transosseous disruption, creating an AO type B1 fracture. The implant load on the rod was measured using an implantable strain sensor (Monitor) on one rod and on the contralateral rod by a strain gauge to validate the Monitor's measurements. In parallel the range of motion (ROM) was assessed.

Result

The ROM increased significantly in all directions in the fractured model (p≤0.049). The Monitor measured a significant increase in implant load in FE (p=0.002) and LB (p=0.045), however, not in AR. The strain gauge detected an increased implant load not only in FE (p=0.001) and LB (p=0.016), but also in AR (p=0.047). The highest strain signal was found during LB for both, the Monitor, and the strain gauge.

Conclusion

After a complete transosseous disruption of L3 vertebra the load on the implants was significantly higher than in the intact respectively healed state. Innovative implantable sensors could be used to monitor those changes allowing the assessment of healing progression based on quantifiable data rather than CT-imaging.


Corresponding author: Maximilian Heumann