Abstract
Recently, a new suture was designed to minimize laxity in order to preserve consistent tissue approximation while improving footprint compression after tendon repair. The aims of this study were: (1) to compare the biomechanical competence of two different high strength sutures in terms of slippage and failure load, (2) to investigate the influence of both knots number and different media (air, saline and fat) on the holding capacity of the knots.
Alternating surgical knots of two different high-strength sutures (group1: FibreWire; group2: DynaCord; n = 105) were tied on two roller bearings with 50N tightening force. Biomechanical testing was performed in each medium applying ramped monotonic tension to failure defined in terms of either knot slippage or suture rupture. For each group and medium, seven specimens with either 3, 4, 5, 6, or 7 knots each were tested, evaluating their knot slippage and ultimate load to failure. The minimum number of knots preventing slippage failure and thus resulting in suture rupture was determined in each group and medium, and taken as a criterium for better performance when comparing the groups.
In each group and medium failure occurred via suture rupture in all specimens for the following minimum knot numbers: group1: air – 7, saline – 7, fat – 7; group2: air – 6; saline – 4; fat – 5. The direct comparison between the groups when using 7 knots demonstrated significantly larger slippage in group1 (6.5 ± 2.2 mm) versus group2 (3.5 ± 0.4 mm) in saline (p < 0.01) but not in the other media (p ≥0.52). Ultimate load was comparable between the two groups for all three media (p ≥ 0.06).
The lower number of required knots providing sufficient repair stability, smaller slippage levels and identical suture strength, combined with the known laxity alleviation effect demonstrate advantages of DynaCord versus FibreWire.
