Abstract
Introduction
Activity scales are used throughout orthopaedics as a component of PROMs. Tegner Activity Scale is commonly used and is validated in various knee injuries in adults. It has a reading age of 18 years presenting an understanding problem for children. An alternative is HSS-PediFABS, but this looks at specific skills like running, cutting, pivoting rather than sporting level. Our aim was to determine if children understood TAS and whether their answers compared to how their parents scored them and determine if our suggested sporting levels were more appropriate for them.
Method
We created a study form to compare levels given by children and their parent. We added our own suggested levels, with a reading age of 9, created by a discussion group of paediatric orthopaedic surgeons. Following ethics approval, a sample size was determined via power calculation. All patients over 7 and their parents presenting to the orthopaedic clinic at SCH over a 4-month period were asked to fill out the TAS, baseline questions and rank the new suggested sporting levels.
Results
51 patients and their parents were recruited, with a mean age of 13 (±0.31, 8–17). 35% female. The mean TAS score for children rating themselves was 7.04 (±0.32, 2–10) vs 6.43 (±0.37, 0–10) for parents rating the child (p=0.31). The average weekly activity time rated by children was 6.72 hours (±0.84, 0–30) vs 7.48 (±1.02, 0–36) rated by the parent (p=0.68). Our suggested levels for paediatric patients were ordered correctly by both groups (mode score). The mean new activity level for children was 4.9 (±0.24, 2–9) vs 4.81 (±0.26, 1–8) by their parent(p=0.79). The mean score difference for TAS was 1.42 vs 1.2 in the new score (p=0.38).
Conclusion
Paediatric patients had difficulty understanding the TAS and there was poor agreement of activity levels between patients and parents.
