Abstract
Introduction
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLr) is the most widely published operation in the orthopaedic literature. Over recent years there has been increased interest in the surgical technique and role of concomitant procedures performed during ACLr. The National Ligament Registry (NLR) collects robust data on ACLr performed in the UK. In this registry analysis we explore trends in ACLr surgery and how they relate to published literature and the growing industry portfolio available to surgeons.
Methods
Using data from the NLR, 14,352 ACLr performed between 2013–2021 were analysed. High impact papers on ACLr were then cross referenced against this data to see if surgical practice was influenced by literature or whether surgical practice dictated publication. Common trends were also compared to key surgical industry portfolios (Arthrex, Smith and Nephew) to see how new technology influenced surgical practice.
Results
The number of ACLr performed in isolation is decreasing. The number of ACL reconstructions involving meniscal surgery shows an increasing trend since 2013, with 57% of ACLr in 2021 now involving meniscus surgery. The number of ACLr with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) has increased sharply since 2018, preceding the stability trial publication in 2020. Graft preference and size has remained static despite the introduction of new graft harvest and fixation devices. Additional procedures such as other ligament reconstruction and additional cartilage surgery have also remained static over time.
Conclusion
In this analysis we looked at surgical trends in ACLr and their relation to literature and industry. Meniscal intervention is increasing, in keeping with the growing level of literature in this area. In the setting of LET, a high impact level 1 study appears to have significantly changed the practice of UK surgeons with a sharp increase in the number of LET procedures being performed. Industry appears to have little influence on the change in surgical trends, suggesting high quality evidence is what drives innovation in ACLr while industry supports rather than influences innovation. It will be interesting to see the impact of the stability 2 study, recent work on the medial structures of the knee and the commissioning of cartilage centres on future trends.
