Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

EARLY-STAGE SELF-ASSEMBLING PEPTIDE HYDROGEL-BASED INTERVENTION FOR ARTICULAR PATELLA CARTILAGE REPAIR

The British Orthopaedic Research Society (BORS) 2023 Meeting, Cambridge, England, 25–26 September 2023.



Abstract

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to develop an in vitro GAG-depleted patella model and assess the biomechanical effects following treatment with a SAP:CS self-assembling hydrogel.

Methods

Porcine patellae (4–6 month old) were harvested and subject to 0.1% (w/v) sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) washes to remove GAGs from the cartilage. Patellae were GAG depleted and then treated by injection with SAP (∼ 6 mM) and CS (10 mg) in Ringer's solution through a 30G needle. Native, GAG depleted and SAP:CS treated patellae were tested through static indentation testing, using 15g load, 5mm indenter over 1hr period. The degree of deformation of each group was assessed and compared (Mann-Whitney, p<0.05). Native, GAG depleted, sham (saline only) and SAP:CS treated paired patellae and femurs were additionally characterized tribologically through sequential wear testing when undergoing a walking gait profile (n=6 per group). The cartilage surfaces were assessed and compared (Mann-Whitney, p<0.05) using the ICRS scoring system, surface damage was illustrated through the application of Indian ink.

Results

Static indentation tests indicated significant increase in indentation deformation of GAG depleted group compared to native group (n=6, p<0.01) and significant reduction in deformation of SAP:CS treated group compared to GAG depleted group (n=6, p<0.05). Sequential wear tests indicated a significant increase in the cartilage damage on the both surfaces of the patellofemoral joint in the GAG depleted group, compared to the native group (n=6, p<0.001), Following SAP:CS treatment, significant protection from damage was observed on femoral surface (n=6, p<0.005), with some non-significant reduction in damage on the patella surface. Sham injections showed no significant increase in damage compared to the native and treated samples.

Conclusions

The ∼50% reduction of GAGs represented a moderate osteoarthritic patella cartilage model. This same loss transferred to the dynamic wear tests with significant changes in the damage on the femoral counter face associated with the GAG loss. SAP:CS treatment showed promise in restoring cartilage stiffness to treat Chondromalacia patella in static indentation tests. Sequential wear tests showed that the SAP:CS treatment protects the cartilage layer of both surfaces in the patellofemoral joint from damage in an extreme degeneration model. The sham injections showed that injecting cartilage with a 30G and saline does not cause any significant damage to the cartilage layer.

Declaration of Interest

(a) fully declare any financial or other potential conflict of interest