header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

EARLY RESULTS FROM OUR EXPERIENCE WITH THE STRYDE NAIL: A CAUSE FOR CONCERN?

The British Limb Reconstruction Society (BLRS) 2021 Annual Scientific Meeting, Virtual Conference, held online, 15 April 2021.



Abstract

Introduction

The STRYDE nail is an evolution of the PRECICE Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System, with unique features regarding its composition. It is designed for load bearing throughout treatment in order to improve patient experience and outcomes and allow for simultaneous bilateral lower limb lengthening. The literature published to date is limited with regards to both outcomes and potential issues. In this paper we report on our early experience and raise awareness for the potential of adverse effects from this device.

Materials and Methods

This is a review of all patients treated in our institution using this implant. Data were prospectively recorded. We report on demographics, nail accuracy, reliability, consolidation index and cases where concerning clinical and radiological findings were encountered.

Results

14 Stryde nails were implanted in nine patients (three males and six females) between June 2019 and September 2020. Mean age at surgery was 33 years old (14–65 years old). Five patients underwent bilateral lengthening (two femoral and three tibial) and four patients unilateral femoral lengthening for multiple aetiologies. By the time of this report eight patients (13 implants) had completed lengthening. Osteolysis and periosteal reaction at the junction of the telescopic nail was evident in nine implants. Five patients experienced localised pain and swelling. Macroscopic appearances following retrieval were consistent with corrosion at the telescopic junction. Tissue histology was consistent with effects of focal metallic wear debris.

Conclusions

From our early experience with this implant we have found the process of lengthening to be accurate and reliable with good regenerate formation and consolidation. Proposed advantages of early load bearing and the ability for bilateral lengthening are promising. We have, however, encountered cases with concerning clinical and radiological findings. We have elected to discontinue its use to allow further investigation into the retrieved implants and patient outcomes from users internationally.