Abstract
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
Valgus high tibial osteotomy (HTO) represents an effective treatment for patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA) in a varus knee. However, the mechanisms which cause this clinical improvement are unclear. Previous studies suggest a wider stance gait can reduce medial compartment loading via reduction in the external knee adduction moment (KAM); a measure implicated in progression of medial compartment OA. This study aimed to measure whether valgus HTO is associated with a postoperative increase in static stance width.
METHODS
32 patients, recruited in the Biomechanics and Bioengineering Centre Versus Arthritis HTO study, underwent valgus (medial opening wedge) HTO. Weightbearing pre- and post- operative radiographs were taken showing both lower limbs. The horizontal distance, measured from a fixed point on the right talus to the corresponding point on the left, was divided by the talus width to give a standardised “stance width” for each radiograph. The difference between pre- and post- operative stance width was compared for each patient using a paired sample t-test.
RESULTS
Preoperatively, mean stance was 4.00 talar-widths but postoperatively this increased to 5.41. This mean increase of 1.42 talar-widths was statistically significant (p=0.001) and represents a mean proportional increase in stance width of 35.5% following HTO. Of the 32 patients, 23 showed increased stance width and 9 decreased (range −4.64 to 6.00 talar-widths).
CONCLUSIONS
These findings indicate an association of frontal plane surgical realignment at the proximal tibia via a medial opening wedge HTO with an increased stance width on postoperative radiographs. Considering both wider stance gait and HTO have been shown to affect the progression of medial compartment OA, these results may explain one mechanism contributing to the efficacy of HTO surgery. However, the range of changes in stance width suggests significant variability in how patients adapt at a whole-limb and whole-body level following HTO.
Declaration of Interest
(b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project.
