Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Osteoporosis of the pelvis and femur is diagnosed in a high proportion of lower-limb amputees which carries an increased fracture risk and subsequently serious implications on mobility, physical dependency and morbidity. Through the development of biofidelic musculoskeletal and finite element (FE) models, we aim to determine the effect of lower-limb amputation on long-term bone remodelling in the hip and to understand the potential underpinning mechanisms for bone degradation in the younger amputee population.
Methods
Our models are patient specific and anatomically accurate. Geometries are derived from MRI-scans of one bilateral, above-knee, amputee and one body-matched control subject. Musculoskeletal modelling enables comparison of muscle and joint reaction-forces throughout gait. This provides the loading scenario implemented in FE. FE modelling demonstrates the effect of loading on the amputated limb via a prosthetic socket by comparing bone mechanical stimulation in amputee and control cases.
Results
Musculoskeletal modelling shows that the bilateral amputee has 25% higher peak hip-reaction force than controls but a 54% lower peak knee-reaction force. Compensation for missing muscles and joints cause large-scale changes to the muscle loading patterns of the residual limb. FE analysis shows a 32% reduction in bone stimulation within the proximal femur and an 81% reduction in the distal femoral shaft when compared to the healthy control. A shielding effect from weight-bearing through a prosthetic socket was observed that may offset any increases in joint and muscle loading at the amputated hip.
Conclusions
Bone loss in the young amputee population could be driven by unloading osteopenia where altered joint and muscle loads cause altered mechanical stimulus in the femur. Over many cycles of remodelling, a net bone loss occurs. Importantly, this suggests that the issue is preventable, or even reversible, with the implementation of targeted loading regimes or changes to the design of the prosthetic socket.
Declaration of Interest
(b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project.
