Abstract
Abstract
Background
Rotator cuff injuries have traditionally been managed by either single-row or double-row arthroscopic repair techniques. Novel and more complex single-row methodologies have recently been proposed as a biomechanically stronger alternative. However, no rigorous meta-analysis has evaluated the effectiveness of complex single-row against double-row repair. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with full-thickness rotator cuff injuries treated with both simple and complex single-row, as well as transosseous-equivalent double-row procedures.
Methods
An up-to-date literature search was performed using the pre-defined search strategy. All studies that met the inclusion criteria were assessed for methodological quality and included in the meta-analysis. Pain score, functional score, range-of-motion and Re-tear rate were all considered in the study.
Conclusion
The results of this meta-analysis suggest the there is no significant difference between simple single-row and TOE double-row in any of the observed outcomes. However, there are significantly improved ASES functional scores and lower re-tear rates with TOE DR when compared to sSR. The available data in the literature would therefore advocate the use of transosseous-equivalent double-row fixation for the treatment of full thickness cuff tears. This paper has highlighted other significant limitations in the included studies where further, more extensive literature is required on the subject to draw more robust conclusions.
