Abstract
INTRODUCTION
The medial-stabilised (MS) knee implant, characterised by a spherical medial condyle on the femoral component and a medially congruent tibial bearing, was developed to improve knee kinematics and stability relative to performance obtained in posterior-stabilised (PS) and cruciate-retaining (CR) designs. We aimed to compare in vivo six-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) kinematics during overground walking for these three knee designs.
METHODS
Seventy-five patients (42 males, 33 females, age 68.4±6.6 years) listed for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery were recruited to this study, which was approved by the relevant Human Research Ethics committees. Each patient was randomly- assigned a PS, CR or MS knee (Medacta International AB, Switzerland) resulting in three groups of 23, 26 and 26 patients, respectively. Patients visited the Biomotion Laboratory at the University of Melbourne 6±1.1 months after surgery, where they walked overground at their self-selected speed. A custom Mobile Biplane X-ray (MoBiX) imaging system tracked and imaged the implanted knee at 200 Hz. The MoBiX system measures 6-DOF tibiofemoral kinematics of TKA knees during overground gait with maximum RMS errors of 0.65° and 0.33 mm for rotations and translations, respectively.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Mean walking speeds for the three groups were not significantly different (PS, 0.86±0.14 m/s CR, 0.82±0.17 m/s and MS, 0.87±0.14 m/s, p>0.25). While most kinematic parameters were similar for the PS and CR groups, mean peak-to-peak anterior drawer was greater for PS (9.89 mm) than CR (7.75 mm, p=0.004), which in turn was greater than that for MS (4.43 mm, p<0.001). Mean tibial external rotation was greater for MS than PS (by 3.12°, p=0.033) and CR (by 3.34°, p=0.029). Anterior drawer and lateral shift were highly coupled to external rotation for MS but not so for PS and CR. The contact centres on the tibial bearing translated predominantly in the anterior-posterior direction for all three designs. Peak-to-peak anterior-posterior translation of the contact centres in the medial compartment was largest for PS (7.09 mm) followed by CR (5.45 mm, p=0.003) and MS (2.89 mm, p<0.001). The contact centre in the lateral compartment was located 2.5 mm more laterally for MS than PS and CR (p<0.001). The centre of rotation of the knee in the transverse plane was located in the medial compartment for MS and in the lateral compartment for both PS and CR.
CONCLUSIONS
We quantitatively compared in vivo 6-DOF joint motion for PS, CR, and MS knees during locomotion. A higher degree of coupling between external rotation and anterior-posterior translation, greater constraint in the anterior-posterior direction, and a more medialised joint centre of rotation observed for the MS knees are explained by the highly congruent medial articulation characterising this design.
