Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Postoperative functional limitations after Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) are caused, in part, by a mismatch between a patient's natural anatomy and conventional “off-the-shelf” implants. To address this, we propose a new concept combining off-the-shelf femur and tibia implants with custom polyethylene tibial inserts designed to account for a patient's unique anatomy. Our goal in this study was to use knee specific computational modeling to determine the neutral path of motion and laxity of an intact knee under axial compression and shear forces through full flexion and compare intact motion against the same knee implanted with a conventional off-the-shelf vs. a custom tibial insert.
METHODS
3D models of a healthy knee joint were acquired from an open development repository funded by the National Institute of Biomedical Imagining and Bioengineering (Harris et al., 2016). The knee model was virtually implanted with conventional (off-the-shelf) posterior cruciate retaining (CR) components including the femoral component, tibial tray, and a conventional insert. A custom CR tibial insert was designed taking into account native articular geometry and compatibility with placement of the off-the-shelf femoral/tibial tray. Bone, cartilage and implant models were imported into ANSYS Workbench. Ligaments were calibrated using data from in-vitro experimental tests (Harris et al., 2016). The following load conditions were applied to the femur: 20 N axial compression (neutral path), 20 N axial compression with 80 N anterior shear force, and 20 N axial compression with 80 N posterior shear force. Simultaneously for each loading condition, the knee was flexed from 0 – 120 degrees. A circular axis system was used to describe the motion of the femur relative to the tibia.
RESULTS
For the intact case, neutral path was characterized by greater posterior femoral displacement on the lateral side than on the medial side, especially in early flexion. Neutral path of the custom insert was closer to intact condition than the conventional insert. Overall AP laxity was similar between intact and implanted models except at 30 degrees where increased laxity occurred posteriorly for the implanted models, likely due to resection of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) as part of the TKA procedure. For intact and implanted models, AP laxity significantly decreased at the higher flexion angles.
DISCUSSION
Our findings indicate that motion with a custom tibial insert was closer to intact than the conventional design. Nonetheless, custom articular surface alone may not fully reproduce intact motion due to limitations such as resection of the ACL, and such custom inserts may benefit from guiding features such as a cam, post, or retention of the native ACL to more closely reproduce normal knee function. We did not simulate specific activities of daily living. Increasing the magnitudes of compression and shear forces would not change the neutral path of motion, although, a reduction in laxity would be expected.
