Abstract
Aim
To evaluate bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation to metallic cerclage wire versus polymer cerclage system (SuperCable®)
Methods
Experimental in vitro study to evaluate quantitative bacterial adherence to different cerclage wire materials. Two types of cerclage wires were compared: a metallic versus a polymer based wire (SuperCable®).
A two-centimeter cerclage wire piece of each material was included in 2 mL of tryptic soy broth (TSB) culture media, inoculated with 10 microliters of a 0.5 McFarland of a Staphylococcus epidermidis strain and cultivated at 37°C during 2h for adhesion and 48h for biofilm formation. After this time, the cerclages were washed using a 1% phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and sonicated in new culture medium. After sonication, dilutions of each culture were spread in TSB agar and incubated 37°C during 24h. The number of colonies were counted and the cfu/cm2 was calculated.
Results
There were no differences in the number of colonies counted at 2 hours. At 48 hours, the polymer cerclage system showed a clinically and statistically reduction of 95.2% in the biofilm formation of S. epidermidis.
The highest bacterial counts were observed in metallic cerclages after 48h.
Conclusion
In in vitro conditions, the polymer cerclage system may offer decreased biofilm formation compared with metallic cerclage wires. However, there are many other factors in in vivo conditions that could play a role in bacterial adhesion to cerclage wires. Further research is needed in order to recommend the use of polymer cerclage systems for septic revision surgery.
