Abstract
The primary aim of this study was to compare the knee specific functional outcome of partial compared with total knee replacement (TKR) for the management of patellofemoral osteoarthritis.
Fifty-four consecutive Avon patellofemoral replacements were identified and propensity score matched to a group of 54 patients undergoing a TKR with patella resurfacing for patellofemoral osteoarthritis. The Oxford knee score (OKS), the Short Form (SF-) 12 and patient satisfaction were collected (mean follow up 9.2 years). Survival was defined by revision or intention to revise.
There was no significant difference in the OKS (p>0.60) or SF-12 (p>0.28) between the groups. The TKR group was significantly less likely to be satisfied with their knee (95.1% versus 78.3%, OR 0.18, p=0.03). Length of stay was significantly (p=0.008) shorter for the Avon group (difference 1.8 days, 95% CI 0.4 to 3.2). The 10 year survival for the Avon group was 92.3% (95% CI 87.1 to 97.5) and for the TKR group was 100% (95% CI 93.8 to 100). There was no statistical difference in the survival rate (Log Rank p=0.10).
The Avon patellofemoral replacement have a shorter length of stay with a functional outcome and satisfaction rate that is equal to that of TKR. The benefits of the Avon need to be balanced against the increased rate of revision when compared with TKR.
