Abstract
Introduction
Fracture and deformity after frame removal is a known risk in 9–14.5% of patients after circular frame treatment. The aims of this study were to assess the effectiveness of our staged protocol for frame removal and risk factors for the protocol failure.
Methods and materials
We identified 299 consecutive patients who underwent circular frame fixation for fracture or deformity correction in our unit from our prospective database. All 247 patients who followed the staged frame removal protocol were included in this study. We reviewed the electronic clinical record and radiographs of each patient to record demographics, risk factors for treatment failure and outcome following frame removal. We defined failure of the protocol as a re-fracture or change in bony alignment within 12 weeks of frame removal. Results underwent statistical analysis using Chi square analysis.
Results
Of the 247 patients, 196 were trauma patients, of which 56 were open fractures and 48 were elective cases. There were 92 Ilizarov frames and 155 hexapods. 93 patients were smokers. The protocol failed to prevent mechanical failure after frame removal in 10 patients, of which four had refracture and six had an increase in deformity. The average increase in deformity was 7.7 in the frontal plane and 3.8 in the lateral plane. We identified risk factors for mechanical failure in eight of the ten; four were smokers, two were on steroids and two had hypophosphataemic rickets. Of the ten patients, four were for elective indications, six for trauma. Two of the six trauma patients had been treated for open fractures. ‘The type of frame and smoking history showed no statistical association with mechanical failure. Four patients went to have another frame, five were managed with plaster and one patient refused further treatment.
Conclusion
Our staged reloading protocol may delay frame removal however it is a simple and effective way to confirm the timing of frame removal.
